[Cryptography Team] your thoughts

[Robert]

I see, so am I making the wrong moves promoting ProCrypto? I was tying to indicate  the we have professional grade encryption and a specific release number (v1.1.1) and so I was trying to drum up some interest in college programs in encryption.

Do you think I should roll back and call it Cryptography v1.1.1?

thanks, r

On 3/12/20 10:09 PM, Ron Teitelbaum wrote:

> Hi Rob,
>
> The name ProCryptov sounds russian.  Not sure that the name really adds any benefit in terms of conveying meaning.
>
> I'm not sure what it is intended to mean.  I think name Cryptography is clear.
>
> All the best,
>
> Ron

On 3/12/20 10:05 PM, David T. Lewis wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 12:29:32AM +0000, Robert wrote:
>
>> Hey all'y'all,
>>
>> I have a question. As I am marketing Crypto/Squeak as ProCrypto and pointing them to the Cryptography repository, would it make sense to rename all these Cryptography packages as ProCryptov1_1_1?
>
> No, that would not make sense.
>
> Dave

--
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20200313/f07053d7/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Bunny-Bow-Tie.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6482 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20200313/f07053d7/attachment-0001.png>