[Cryptography Team] your thoughts

[Ron Teitelbaum]

Hi Rob,

I like the promotion and the bunny. Just not the package name.  I
think Cryptography
is a better name for the packages. So yes, if you would, can you go back to
that name? (I don't see the versions committed)  The version can be saved
as a Monticello conf map.

If you want to commit the Monticello Configuration with all the proper
package versions loaded and call that ProCrypto-v1.001.1 that works for me.

All the best,

Ron

On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:03 PM Robert <robert.withers at pm.me> wrote:

> I see, so am I making the wrong moves promoting ProCrypto? I was tying to
> indicate  the we have professional grade encryption and a specific release
> number (v1.1.1) and so I was trying to drum up some interest in college
> programs in encryption.
>
> Do you think I should roll back and call it Cryptography v1.1.1?
>
> thanks, r
>
>
> On 3/12/20 10:09 PM, Ron Teitelbaum wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> The name ProCryptov sounds russian.  Not sure that the name really adds
> any benefit in terms of conveying meaning.
>
> I'm not sure what it is intended to mean.  I think name Cryptography is
> clear.
>
> All the best,
>
> Ron
>
> On 3/12/20 10:05 PM, David T. Lewis wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 12:29:32AM +0000, Robert wrote:
>
> Hey all'y'all,
>
> I have a question. As I am marketing Crypto/Squeak as ProCrypto and pointing them to the Cryptography repository, would it make sense to rename all these Cryptography packages as ProCryptov1_1_1?
>
>
> No, that would not make sense.
>
> Dave
>
>
> --
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20200312/764a3b36/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Bunny-Bow-Tie.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6482 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20200312/764a3b36/attachment.png>