[Cryptography Team] your thoughts

[Ron Teitelbaum]

Hi Rob,

1. From the Open Menu select Monticello Configurations.
2. Right click and Add Repositories (Cryptography)
3. Add Packages.  Add all of the packages you want loaded in the order you
want them loaded.
4. Store and name the configuration with the version number:
ProCrypto-1.001.1  I would recommend the 001 instead of .1 so that the
order stays consistent over time unless you do not expect to have more than
9 sub versions.

When you are updating the map just load the new packages in your image,
open the map from the monticello browser (browse the cryptography
repository and select ProCrypto and press browse), then press the Update
button and "select from image" (or something like that) to update the
configuration with the packages loaded in the image.  It will pick up the
new packages.  Then Store and bump the number.

You can also open a Monticello Configuration by selecting it in the repo
(browse the repo to find it) and selecting browse, and then install that
configuration by pressing the install button.  if the order is important
you can order them with the up, down buttons, and you can remove a package
if it is no longer needed.  Post does something but I'm not really sure
what :).  Configurations can also include multiple repositories but that is
an advanced lesson for another day :).

[image: Capture.PNG]

Hope that helps!

All the best,

Ron Teitelbaum

On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:56 PM Robert <robert.withers at pm.me> wrote:

> Alright, so promote ProCrypto as the release version but keep all the
> package names the same. One move that will occur, once we have Levente work
> in CryptographyHashing, I was going to name that v1.2.1.
>
> Ok, a Monticello conf map, how do I do it? I can't seem to get it right.
> And I know very little about them. Looking for instructions...
>
> k, r
> On 3/12/20 11:52 PM, Ron Teitelbaum wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> I like the promotion and the bunny. Just not the package name.  I think Cryptography
> is a better name for the packages. So yes, if you would, can you go back
> to that name? (I don't see the versions committed)  The version can be
> saved as a Monticello conf map.
>
> If you want to commit the Monticello Configuration with all the proper
> package versions loaded and call that ProCrypto-v1.001.1 that works for
> me.
>
> All the best,
>
> Ron
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:03 PM Robert <robert.withers at pm.me> wrote:
>
>> I see, so am I making the wrong moves promoting ProCrypto? I was tying to
>> indicate  the we have professional grade encryption and a specific release
>> number (v1.1.1) and so I was trying to drum up some interest in college
>> programs in encryption.
>>
>> Do you think I should roll back and call it Cryptography v1.1.1?
>>
>> thanks, r
>>
>>
>> On 3/12/20 10:09 PM, Ron Teitelbaum wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> The name ProCryptov sounds russian.  Not sure that the name really adds
>> any benefit in terms of conveying meaning.
>>
>> I'm not sure what it is intended to mean.  I think name Cryptography is
>> clear.
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>> Ron
>>
>> On 3/12/20 10:05 PM, David T. Lewis wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 12:29:32AM +0000, Robert wrote:
>>
>> Hey all'y'all,
>>
>> I have a question. As I am marketing Crypto/Squeak as ProCrypto and pointing them to the Cryptography repository, would it make sense to rename all these Cryptography packages as ProCryptov1_1_1?
>>
>>
>> No, that would not make sense.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>> --
>>
> --
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20200313/a3130a21/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Bunny-Bow-Tie.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6482 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20200313/a3130a21/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Capture.PNG
Type: image/png
Size: 45769 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20200313/a3130a21/attachment-0003.png>