[Cryptography Team] your thoughts

[Ron Teitelbaum]

Yes that sounds terrific!

All the best,

Ron

On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 12:18 AM Robert <robert.withers at pm.me> wrote:

> I forgot to mention what I had planned to say. I will be splitting off of
> all packages a test package, so CryptographyRandomTests, for instance. So
> there is a full set of parallel Tests packages and I will link the
> dependencies the same, so if you do:
>
> Installer ss
>     project: 'Cryptography'
>     install: 'CryptographyX509';
>     install: 'CryptographyX509Tests'.
>
> Then all Cryptography*** code packages will be loaded and all
> Cryptography***Tests test packages will be loaded.
>
> Sound fair?
>
> k, r
> On 3/12/20 11:56 PM, Robert wrote:
>
> Alright, so promote ProCrypto as the release version but keep all the
> package names the same. One move that will occur, once we have Levente work
> in CryptographyHashing, I was going to name that v1.2.1.
>
> Ok, a Monticello conf map, how do I do it? I can't seem to get it right.
> And I know very little about them. Looking for instructions...
>
> k, r
> On 3/12/20 11:52 PM, Ron Teitelbaum wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> I like the promotion and the bunny. Just not the package name.  I think Cryptography
> is a better name for the packages. So yes, if you would, can you go back
> to that name? (I don't see the versions committed)  The version can be
> saved as a Monticello conf map.
>
> If you want to commit the Monticello Configuration with all the proper
> package versions loaded and call that ProCrypto-v1.001.1 that works for
> me.
>
> All the best,
>
> Ron
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:03 PM Robert <robert.withers at pm.me> wrote:
>
>> I see, so am I making the wrong moves promoting ProCrypto? I was tying to
>> indicate  the we have professional grade encryption and a specific release
>> number (v1.1.1) and so I was trying to drum up some interest in college
>> programs in encryption.
>>
>> Do you think I should roll back and call it Cryptography v1.1.1?
>>
>> thanks, r
>>
>>
>> On 3/12/20 10:09 PM, Ron Teitelbaum wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> The name ProCryptov sounds russian.  Not sure that the name really adds
>> any benefit in terms of conveying meaning.
>>
>> I'm not sure what it is intended to mean.  I think name Cryptography is
>> clear.
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>> Ron
>>
>> On 3/12/20 10:05 PM, David T. Lewis wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 12:29:32AM +0000, Robert wrote:
>>
>> Hey all'y'all,
>>
>> I have a question. As I am marketing Crypto/Squeak as ProCrypto and pointing them to the Cryptography repository, would it make sense to rename all these Cryptography packages as ProCryptov1_1_1?
>>
>>
>> No, that would not make sense.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>> --
>>
> --
>
> --
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20200313/52ba5bc3/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Bunny-Bow-Tie.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6482 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20200313/52ba5bc3/attachment-0001.png>