[Cryptography Team] your thoughts

[Robert]

I forgot to mention what I had planned to say. I will be splitting off of all packages a test package, so CryptographyRandomTests, for instance. So there is a full set of parallel Tests packages and I will link the dependencies the same, so if you do:

Installer ss
    project: 'Cryptography'
    install: 'CryptographyX509';
    install: 'CryptographyX509Tests'.

Then all Cryptography*** code packages will be loaded and all Cryptography***Tests test packages will be loaded.

Sound fair?

k, r

On 3/12/20 11:56 PM, Robert wrote:

> Alright, so promote ProCrypto as the release version but keep all the package names the same. One move that will occur, once we have Levente work in CryptographyHashing, I was going to name that v1.2.1.
>
> Ok, a Monticello conf map, how do I do it? I can't seem to get it right. And I know very little about them. Looking for instructions...
>
> k, r
>
> On 3/12/20 11:52 PM, Ron Teitelbaum wrote:
>
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> I like the promotion and the bunny. Just not the package name.  I think Cryptography is a better name for the packages. So yes, if you would, can you go back to that name?  (I don't see the versions committed)  The version can be saved as a Monticello conf map.
>>
>> If you want to commit the Monticello Configuration with all the proper package versions loaded and call that ProCrypto-v1.001.1 that works for me.
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>> Ron
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:03 PM Robert <robert.withers at pm.me> wrote:
>>
>>> I see, so am I making the wrong moves promoting ProCrypto? I was tying to indicate  the we have professional grade encryption and a specific release number (v1.1.1) and so I was trying to drum up some interest in college programs in encryption.
>>>
>>> Do you think I should roll back and call it Cryptography v1.1.1?
>>>
>>> thanks, r
>>>
>>> On 3/12/20 10:09 PM, Ron Teitelbaum wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Rob,
>>>>
>>>> The name ProCryptov sounds russian.  Not sure that the name really adds any benefit in terms of conveying meaning.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure what it is intended to mean.  I think name Cryptography is clear.
>>>>
>>>> All the best,
>>>>
>>>> Ron
>>>
>>> On 3/12/20 10:05 PM, David T. Lewis wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 12:29:32AM +0000, Robert wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hey all'y'all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a question. As I am marketing Crypto/Squeak as ProCrypto and pointing them to the Cryptography repository, would it make sense to rename all these Cryptography packages as ProCryptov1_1_1?
>>>>
>>>> No, that would not make sense.
>>>>
>>>> Dave
>>>
>>> --
>
> --

--
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20200313/3b1cce3c/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Bunny-Bow-Tie.png
Type: image/png
Size: 6482 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/cryptography/attachments/20200313/3b1cce3c/attachment.png>