[etoys-dev] Packaging Etoys

[Bert Freudenberg]

On 02.03.2010, at 10:31, Karl Ramberg wrote:
> 
> Bert Freudenberg skrev 2010-03-01 23:56:
>> On 01.03.2010, at 23:42, Karl Ramberg wrote:
>>   
>>> Bert Freudenberg skrev 2010-03-01 18:23:
>>>     
>>>> It's a non-issue for us. We just need to re-categorize everything before creating the first "real" Monticello packages. That was the original plan anyway, not sure what the issue at hand is?
>>>> 
>>>> - Bert -
>>>> 
>>>>       
>>> I guess we get a problem if run update stream and refer to methods in now changed categories. It would be nice to detect those on fileIn and put them where they should be.
>>> 
>>> Karl
>>>     
>> What do you mean by "run update stream"?
>> 
>> - Bert -
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   
> If we run  Etoys updates like we used to, with change sets posted to a update server. Specially if the change sets where produced in a not packaged image, method categories could have changed names and would possibly cause trouble. If we could specify which package a method / class from a change set would be loaded to on file in we could avoid some of those issues.
> 
> I am not sure these are valid concerns, I'm not that used to Monticello yet...  ;-)
> 
> karl

We need to use either an update stream or Monticello updates. If used at the same time we would indeed get into trouble.

Did I misunderstand we agreed on that plan in the last dev meeting?

- Bert -