[etoys-dev] Category for user objects

[karl ramberg]

A distinct package name would be nice
I got confuced when Morphic package got changed

EtoysUserScripts would be quite descriptive

Karl

On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de>wrote:

> We might also want to change the category for Kedama players.
>
> declareAndPossiblyRename: only checks for #Player as superclass name. Since
> Kedama uses a different Player class, this falls back to the
> 'Morphic-Imported' category. At least that's what I think is happening.
>
> IMHO we should change those categories to not collide with the MC package
> names. Either put everything into "Object categoryForUniclasses", or have
> multiple categories as previously, but use a distinct name. E.g.
> 'UserObjects-Morphic', 'UserObjects-Etoys', 'UserObjects-Balloon3D'.
>
> Opinions?
>
> - Bert -
>
> On 27.05.2011, at 00:38, karl ramberg wrote:
>
> > Found it:
> > ReleaseBuilder new cleanUpEtoys
> >
> > Karl
> >
> > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:36 AM, karl ramberg <karlramberg at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> I have a issue with Monticello and Kedama.
> >> I updated project Particle dye in water, but noticed that this adds
> Kedama players in a category: 'Morphic-Imported'
> >>
> >> Should I just ignore this ?
> >>
> >> I'm not quite sure how to fix it...
> >>
> >> Karl
> >>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> etoys-dev mailing list
> etoys-dev at squeakland.org
> http://lists.squeakland.org/mailman/listinfo/etoys-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakland.org/pipermail/etoys-dev/attachments/20110527/c53f7584/attachment-0001.html>