exupery vm

[Jakub Kozisek]

I will try to do the benchmarks also with 3.8 and 3.8.1 later this
evening (night :).

But for my amateur eye it was interesting to see the difference with
largeExplorers benchmark on my 3 machines - 1:2:3.

On 11/16/06, bryce at kampjes.demon.co.uk <bryce at kampjes.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > One more question.  How safe is it to stick with the exupery vm for
> > my non-exupery-loaded images?
>
> Loading Exupery from SqueakMap is perfectly safe. The main reason
> I provide the pre-build VMs is to make it easier to get started.
> They are also a useful basis for macro benchmarks as the code behind
> the benchmark will be the same.
>
> I suspect that some of the differences with largeExplorer performance
> was due to image differences. I benchmarked using 3.8, Andy used
> 3.8.1, and Jakub used the pre-built 3.9.
>
> Bryce
> _______________________________________________
> Exupery mailing list
> Exupery at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/exupery
>