exupery vm

[Andrew Tween]

<bryce at kampjes.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:17756.48273.778676.949028 at gargle.gargle.HOWL...
>
> > One more question.  How safe is it to stick with the exupery vm for
> > my non-exupery-loaded images?
>
> Loading Exupery from SqueakMap is perfectly safe. The main reason
> I provide the pre-build VMs is to make it easier to get started.
> They are also a useful basis for macro benchmarks as the code behind
> the benchmark will be the same.
>
> I suspect that some of the differences with largeExplorer performance
> was due to image differences. I benchmarked using 3.8, Andy used
> 3.8.1, and Jakub used the pre-built 3.9.

Actually, I used 3.8-6665-full for the benchmarks.

>
> Bryce