[Io] Picking up where we left it

[Ken Causey]

On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 22:38 +0100, Cees De Groot wrote:
> On 3/15/06, Ken Causey <ken at kencausey.com> wrote:
> > What image do I use to test bugs/fixes and create fixes?
> >
> 3.9-latest, I'd say.

Look.  If it were that simple I wouldn't be asking this.

What does '3.9-latest' mean?  The latest that the release team has
released to the community and updated to ftp.squeak.org/3.9alpha/ ?  Or
do I take that and check for updates (update stream)?  Do I also check
the 3.9 inbox?  What about the team inbox?

> 
> > What do I do with a fix that I think works?  What format do I use for
> > it?
> >
> Monticello.

And do what with it?

> 
> > When I go on to work on another issue do I start back with a clean image
> > or use an image with the fixes I have already produced/ok'ed?  What if
> > the issues are inter-related?
> >
> Good question. In this case, I'd say work from the latest because the
> primary goal is to deliver a single drop to the 3.9 team.

Again, 'latest' here is not at all well defined.

Ken
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/io/attachments/20060315/eb97ba73/attachment.pgp