[Io] Picking up where we left it

[Ken Causey]

What I really need is a procedure to follow regarding handling of Mantis
reports:

What image do I use to test bugs/fixes and create fixes?

What do I do with a fix that I think works?  What format do I use for
it?

When I go on to work on another issue do I start back with a clean image
or use an image with the fixes I have already produced/ok'ed?  What if
the issues are inter-related?

There's probably more, but that's what comes to mind at the moment.

Ken

On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 21:49 +0100, Cees De Groot wrote:
> Hi team,
> 
> I'm almost done moving - after the weekend, I'll declare the project a
> success which means that I'll be able to get back to "work" again.
> 
> Top priority is feeding a new set of packages to the 3.9a team, and
> this shouldn't take more than 1-2 weeks. Besides me, does anyone else
> have some time to work on working through the network and files bugs
> on Mantis? I don't think there aren't that many, and a number of them
> can be declared "presently unfixable" (especially some Files bugs seem
> to need VM-level work), so it shouldn't be too much work to get
> something out.
> 
> After that, Flow? ;)
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Cees

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/io/attachments/20060315/3f4f6ea9/attachment.pgp