Magma used in production apps?

[Chris Muller]

Can you expand on what you mean about the "non standard" part?


On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:48 AM,  <goran at krampe.se> wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
>  "Chris Muller" <asqueaker at gmail.com> wrote:
>  > I am aware of two projects undertaken with Magma that are running in a
>  > corporate "production" environment.  I know there are other
>  > significant projects but not necessarily in "production".
>  >
>  > I myself am not at liberty to discuss them, but I've linked a new
>  > "Magma Projects" page from the home page with a couple of publicly
>  > announced projects which I hope their owners and other projects owners
>  > will add their entry to the page, that this question may be clarified.
>  >
>  >  http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/6030
>
>  Yes, Gjallar is in production today for one customer. They may be
>  expanding it a bit. This is a low volume deployment though. We also have
>  one more customer lined up and interested in a highly customized
>  version.
>
>  Gjallar uses Magma with a relatively complex model. The architecture
>  around transactions is "non standard" though so one should not use
>  Gjallar as a "typical" example of a Magma app.
>
>  regards, Göran
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>  Magma mailing list
>  Magma at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>  http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/magma
>