Fwd: Undirect index update

[Chris Muller]

Hi Hilaire, yes #noteOldKeys: (or whatever it is) needs to be sent if
the hash value changes.

But this should not require an enumeration!  If you have the object
which you are changing, and you have access to the session, you should
have everything you need, no need to iterate..

Just be sure to noteOldKeysFor: *before* you make the change, that way
the correct old key is noted for that object, then, when it commits,
Magma will have the old/new key.

 - Chris

2009/5/12 Hilaire Fernandes <hilaire at ofset.org>:
> I am not sure about this situation.
>
> I have a MagmaCollection  with an index elaborated from a lexical term
> object. The index use the hash value of this lexical term object
>
>
> The lexical terms populate other collections, so these terms can be
> manipulated independently from the object in my MagmaCollection.
>
> Now I am wondering which action I should take when a lexical term is
> edited in a way its hash value is modified.
> Should I iterated in the MagmaCollection the objects referring to this
> same term and send a noteForOldKeys: message ?
>
> Hilaire
>
> _______________________________________________
> Magma mailing list
> Magma at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/magma
>
>