[Seaside-dev] Current working combination of Packages

[Udo Schneider]

Philippe Marschall schrieb:
> Are we talking about Swazoo 1 or Swazoo 2? The latest script I posted
> in the announcement thread should load Swazoo 2 and have it working.
>   
The whole stuff is based on the newest Swazoo beta (2.2 Beta1) - I 
ported this already together with SPort.

> The specific packages are Seaside-Swazoo and Seaside-Adaptors-Swazoo.
> You probably don't need DynamicBindings, KomServices,
> Seaside-Adaptors-Comanche and Seaside-Tests-Adaptors-Comanche as these
> are Kom related.
>   
That's where my problem starts. Which version of 
Seaside-Swazoo/Seaside-Adapters-Swazoo in which Repository should I take?

> General note on porting Seaside 2.9:
> - All the packages that do not have a -Squeak- in the package name
> should be loadable unchanged. If you have to change them that's a bug.
> Please report it.
>   
I'll check it. I think I changed some exception handler stuff as Dolphin 
forces a one argument Block in #on:do:. I'll check.

> - All the packages that do have a -Squeak- in the package name might
> need to be ported. You can either reimplement them or change them. If
> you decide to change them consider developing them in Squeak and then
> loading them unchanged into Dolphin. This should make it easier for
> you to keep in sync with upstream changes because you can simply merge
> using Monticello.
>   
This might be a problem as some Dolphin specific classes are missing in 
Squeak. However I do fully agree to keep everything in sync with the 
main development stream. If I change something in Dolphin which is not 
Dolphin specific I'll move it over to Squeak/Monticello as well.

Thanks,

Udo