[Seaside-dev] Issue 342 in seaside: Canonical URLs

codesite-noreply at google.com codesite-noreply at google.com
Fri Feb 13 20:43:14 UTC 2009


Comment #5 on issue 342 by renggli: Canonical URLs
http://code.google.com/p/seaside/issues/detail?id=342

You are missing the point.

There is no point in including _s and _k, because they are random. Never  
ever. There is no deterministic
connection between these two parameters and the page contents.

Anything that can be bookmarked or that is valuable to a search engine is  
added through #updateUrl:. I can't see
a single case where you want the canonical URL be something different than  
what you get through #updateUrl:
minut _s and _k.

--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings


More information about the seaside-dev mailing list