[Seaside-dev] Seaside-Core-obi.351

[Gerhard Obermann]

Hi!

Because I am using this method in my GemStone Scaffolding Project.
And in my case I have to check for nil.
I know the other solution would be an extra exception handler.
But I don't see any big disadvantages for returning nil if  the application
is not found!
In normal case this should never happen anyway!

Cheers
Gerhard

On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Philippe Marschall <
philippe.marschall at gmail.com> wrote:

> What is the motivation behind this change? Returning nil hardly
> prevents any exceptions, instead it just triggers a
> MessageNotUnderstood because nobody checks for return values. Also the
> only senders of this method are tests.
>
> Cheers
> Philippe
> _______________________________________________
> seaside-dev mailing list
> seaside-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/seaside-dev/attachments/20090101/ce7ee111/attachment.htm