[Seaside] Seaside Performance

Daniel Salama dsalama at user.net
Sat Mar 26 14:51:07 CET 2005


You're right. I timed the script as is and it took 34.7 minutes. When I 
commented out Transcript>>show, it ran in 3.3 seconds.

I'm still going to try and play with concurrency and fork this into a 
separate process.


On Mar 26, 2005, at 4:49 AM, Avi Bryant wrote:

> On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:44:03 -0500, Daniel Salama <dsalama at user.net> 
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I was testing some file I/O reading when I noticed something peculiar.
>> I posted the following on the Squeak mailing list
>> (http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2005-March/
>> 090187.html). Because of this finding, I am wondering how well will a
>> Squeak box perform in a production environment.
> Daniel,
> Don't jump to conclusions.  Transcript>>show: is about the slowest
> thing you could possibly be doing to show progress; comment it out and
> your code will run several orders of magnitude faster.
> Avi
> _______________________________________________
> Seaside mailing list
> Seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/seaside

More information about the Seaside mailing list