[Seaside] Database Integration
rleon at insario.com
Thu Jun 1 16:56:41 UTC 2006
> Still, it seems that a separate dB would provide a nice way
> of accessing different types of data, large quantity of data,
> and a good backup system.
> Am I wrong in thinking this? Let's say you need to store
> audio data and/or video data. This can become quite large.
> What architecture are you suggesting when you recommend object dBs?
Personally, I use Goods, check out the following tutorials on the
There is also, OmniBase, and Magma. Goods and Magma are server based,
OmniBase is file based. I never quite got OmniBases tamed for Seaside
due to it's multiversion concurrency control and sharing objects between
transactions, but I know others have. Magma worked great, as simple as
Goods, but was too new at the time; I chose Goods instead. Things may
have changed since then.
More information about the Seaside