[Seaside] Database Integration
brad at sonaural.com
Thu Jun 1 18:38:06 UTC 2006
Ramon Leon wrote:
>> Still, it seems that a separate dB would provide a nice way
>> of accessing different types of data, large quantity of data,
>> and a good backup system.
>> Am I wrong in thinking this? Let's say you need to store
>> audio data and/or video data. This can become quite large.
>> What architecture are you suggesting when you recommend object dBs?
> Personally, I use Goods, check out the following tutorials on the
> There is also, OmniBase, and Magma. Goods and Magma are server based,
> OmniBase is file based. I never quite got OmniBases tamed for Seaside
> due to it's multiversion concurrency control and sharing objects between
> transactions, but I know others have. Magma worked great, as simple as
> Goods, but was too new at the time; I chose Goods instead. Things may
> have changed since then.
Thanks for the pointers. I'll check them out.
More information about the Seaside