[Seaside] Database Integration

Brad Fuller brad at sonaural.com
Thu Jun 1 18:38:06 UTC 2006

Ramon Leon wrote:
>> Still, it seems that a separate dB would provide a nice way 
>> of accessing different types of data, large quantity of data, 
>> and a good backup system.
>> Am I wrong in thinking this? Let's say you need to store 
>> audio data and/or video data. This can become quite large.
>> What architecture are you suggesting when you recommend object dBs?
>> brad
> Personally, I use Goods, check out the following tutorials on the
> matter...
> http://www.shaffer-consulting.com/david/Seaside/SeasideAndGOODS/
> http://www.techgame.net/projects/Seaside/wiki/UsingGOODS
> There is also, OmniBase, and Magma.  Goods and Magma are server based,
> OmniBase is file based.  I never quite got OmniBases tamed for Seaside
> due to it's multiversion concurrency control and sharing objects between
> transactions, but I know others have.  Magma worked great, as simple as
> Goods, but was too new at the time;  I chose Goods instead.  Things may
> have changed since then.
Thanks for the pointers. I'll check them out.

More information about the Seaside mailing list