[Seaside] Seaside 2.7a1 versions 169
bert at freudenbergs.de
Mon Feb 12 12:21:50 UTC 2007
On Feb 12, 2007, at 10:39 , Philippe Marschall wrote:
> 2007/2/12, Ron Teitelbaum <Ron at usmedrec.com>:
>> Actually no. If you update from repositories, which my system does
>> automatically you will see that it changes back and forth from
>> each version
>> of 169.
> Monticello is not CVS, it does not work like CVS, there is no concept
> of CVS HEAD. The version numbers in the MCZ files are not the same as
> CVS revisions. They are merely a way on making sure the filenames are
> unique. They have _NO_ semantics (which is why you are free to choose
Philippe is right on this one. MC itself does not impose any meaning
on version numbers. MCC should work fine with that. But the "update"
function relies on a specific numbering scheme, which implies a
certain style of development, mimicing CVS HEAD.
OTOH, I think MCC could be made a bit more robust against the case
Ron describes - like, if the same number is seen twice, simply use
the version that sorts first alphabetically.
- Bert -
More information about the Seaside