[Seaside] Which version should I be using? :)
ssastre at seaswork.com
Thu May 10 17:38:03 UTC 2007
I don't like pre built images too much. I build my own every time I
need customizing a stable release of a Squeak image with an installer script
that loads exactly what I ask for. Currently I'm using 3.9 and Seaside
2.7a1-mb.205 well so far.
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: seaside-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> [mailto:seaside-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] En nombre
> de Nevin Pratt
> Enviado el: Jueves, 10 de Mayo de 2007 14:11
> Para: Seaside - general discussion
> Asunto: Re: [Seaside] Which version should I be using? :)
> Brian Brown wrote:
> > Hey all!
> > Currently I'm using Seaside2.7a1-mb.215, but I see lot's of
> fixes in
> > Magritte and Scriptaculous... many relating to 2.8. Is 2.8 ready to
> > use? And also, what is the 2.7b1?
> > Any guidance would be appreciated.
> > Thanks!
> > Brian
> To follow up with Brian's request:
> Note that GemStone ported version 2.6. So, if you are
> planning on using GemStone/Seaside, I would think you
> probably should use 2.6.
> And, I would think an already built Squeak image would be
> best, like what is found on http://www.seaside.st
> That being said, my own "guess" as to the proper image would
> be the 'seaside-2.6.zip' package found at:
> But, I would be very interested in hearing other folk's
> opinions, also.
> Seaside mailing list
> Seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
More information about the seaside