[Seaside] Re: YUI
ssastre at seaswork.com
Thu Nov 1 14:35:40 UTC 2007
I remember one time I was interested in the results that the Dojo
Toolkit achieved. Now I see it's demos barely running well even with the
support from IBM they seems to get.
I agree with Lukas and I'm experimenting that Prototype is a good
choice. Also remember that Prototipe is a product from a affine community, a
community that is technologically very near this one.
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: seaside-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> [mailto:seaside-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] En nombre
> de Lukas Renggli
> Enviado el: Jueves, 01 de Noviembre de 2007 08:04
> Para: Seaside - general discussion
> Asunto: Re: [Seaside] Re: YUI
> > From reading the blog entries on prototype, it looks like
> the problem
> > work within those prototype walls.
> It is indisputable that Prototypes extends the global
> namespace and existing objects in ways that might conflict
> with other libraries. I personally find it very well written, though.
> Prototype takes many ideas from Smalltalk (actually Ruby, but
> 'taking an idea' is transitive). If that was not the case,
> having the possibility to write something like the following
> expression in Smalltalk
> ((SUSelector new matching: 'div.hint')
> select: [ :each | each element visible not ])
> do: [ :each | each effect appear ]
> would be much harder.
> Ideally we had a library that was designed for Seaside and Smalltalk.
> In practice resources are missing to do that. The amount of
> mails discussion about what could be done represents in no
> way what is actually done. Prototype is a reasonable match in
> that sense.
> Lukas Renggli
> seaside mailing list
> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
More information about the seaside