[Seaside] Re: Squeak / Gemstone / VisualWorks with Seaside

[itsme213]

That's encouraging.

Please let me know if this reasoning is flawed ... If my eventual deployment 
will be on Gemstone/S (rather than Squeak), I will need to develop in a 
different environment than deployment anyway, so I might as well choose VW 
over Squeak.

Also (and this may be a bit religious, not my intention ...) is VW a better 
development environment than Squeak (costs aside) ?

Thanks.

===================

"Conrad Taylor" <conradwt at gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:7317d7610710221504u6b06599ej5108835d7bd76a65 at mail.gmail.com...
Hi, it should be a straight forward process if you do not use anything 
specific to VW that doesn't exist in deployment environment.  Also, you'll 
need to file-out your code so that you can imported into the deployment 
platform.  I forget the exact package name that's used for the package but 
I'll post later if no one posts that information.  Lastly, there may be 
other tid-bits in this regard but those are the two that comes to mind.

Good luck,

-Conrad


On 10/22/07, itsme213 <itsme213 at hotmail.com> wrote:
VW appears to be quite polished and robust for development work ... Is any
developing a Seaside app with VW to deploy on Squeak or Gemstone/S? How easy
is it to keep from getting tied up in platform-specifics, and how hard to
port? Does it even make sense to consider this path?

Thanks



_______________________________________________
seaside mailing list
seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside






_______________________________________________
seaside mailing list
seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside