[Seaside] Re: Re: [squeak-dev] [Q] File Upload/Download Server,
Comanche or Swazoo
m.rueger at acm.org
Tue Jul 29 22:40:41 UTC 2008
Philippe Marschall wrote:
> That would interest me too.
> I made some very limited testing on Squeak 3.9.1 and the Mac VM, these
> are my observations:
> 300 MB, hogs CPU badly, image grows dangerously but works
> 600 MB, hogs CPU badly, low space semaphore, image unusable
> 4 GB, Squeak image crashes, system unusable, reboot required
Clearly what you get when streaming into a memory stream first.
More information about the seaside