[Seaside] Re: Re: [squeak-dev] [Q] File Upload/Download Server, Comanche or Swazoo

Michael Rueger m.rueger at acm.org
Tue Jul 29 22:40:41 UTC 2008

Philippe Marschall wrote:

> That would interest me too.
> I made some very limited testing on Squeak 3.9.1 and the Mac VM, these
> are my observations:
> 300 MB, hogs CPU badly, image grows dangerously but works
> 600 MB, hogs CPU badly, low space semaphore, image unusable
> 4 GB, Squeak image crashes, system unusable, reboot required

Clearly what you get when streaming into a memory stream first.


More information about the seaside mailing list