[SoC] Voting policy

[Esteban Lorenzano]

I think there are good punctuations... I will apply them.
Thanks, Matthew

Esteban

El 08/04/2008, a las 11:42AM, Matthew Fulmer escribió:

> Now that the voting period has begun, I think we should create a
> few voting policies. I voted and commented on every application,
> so you can use what I did as an example. Here are the rough
> guidelines I tried to follow:
>
> - I voted on every project with an interested mentor
> - I gave between +4 and -1 for enthusiasm
> - I gave between +4 and 1 for project benefit to squeak (a project can
>   never have non-positive utility)
> - I gave between 0 and -3 for misc deductions, such as:
>   - The project is too big: -2
>   - The project is not described well enough, or too research-y:
>     -1
>   - The student is overqualified: -1 or -2
>
> Overall, my cumulative votes fell between +6 and -1.
>
> -- 
> Matthew Fulmer -- http://mtfulmer.wordpress.com/
> _______________________________________________
> SoC mailing list
> SoC at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/soc

"Querer es suscitar las paradojas"
Camus - El mito de Sísifo

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/soc/attachments/20080408/efbbdedc/attachment.htm