[SoC] Voting policy

[Matthew Fulmer]

On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 10:21:24PM +0200, stephane ducasse wrote:
> I'm sorry but I will not follow this policy. I do not understand why I put 
> -1 to a student
> because he would already know Squeak. But do not answer we do not need to 
> get a consensus
> on that.

Yes. this is just what I did, and how I decided what numbers to
put. I summarized it in order that you don't have to look at all
my votes and do it yourself.

The key thing to agree on is what magnitude of votes we should
use. Some orgs are restricting mentors to -2 .. +2 (5 points of
resolution). I voted before I saw that, and so I'm summarizing
what I did.

-1 .. +7 is what I used (9 points of resolution). I made use of
each score (except for +7) for at least one application.

So, in summary, if your votes have 9 points of resolution, they
are on par with mine, no matter how you decide to score each
project

-- 
Matthew Fulmer -- http://mtfulmer.wordpress.com/