[SoC] Voting policy

[stephane ducasse]

>
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 10:21:24PM +0200, stephane ducasse wrote:
>> I'm sorry but I will not follow this policy. I do not understand  
>> why I put
>> -1 to a student
>> because he would already know Squeak. But do not answer we do not  
>> need to
>> get a consensus
>> on that.
>
> Yes. this is just what I did, and how I decided what numbers to
> put. I summarized it in order that you don't have to look at all
> my votes and do it yourself.
>
> The key thing to agree on is what magnitude of votes we should
> use. Some orgs are restricting mentors to -2 .. +2 (5 points of
> resolution). I voted before I saw that, and so I'm summarizing
> what I did.
>
> -1 .. +7 is what I used (9 points of resolution). I made use of
> each score (except for +7) for at least one application.

Ok I thought that we should only vote once and between +4 -2

>
>
> So, in summary, if your votes have 9 points of resolution, they
> are on par with mine, no matter how you decide to score each
> project

ok then we should all use the same.

>
>
> -- 
> Matthew Fulmer -- http://mtfulmer.wordpress.com/
> _______________________________________________
> SoC mailing list
> SoC at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/soc
>