>From the HTTP 1.1 RFC:

The individual values of the numeric status codes defined for
   HTTP/1.1, and an example set of corresponding Reason-Phrase's, are
   presented below. The reason phrases listed here are only recommended
   -- they may be replaced by local equivalents without affecting the
   protocol.

A client should look at the 200 and not the message. The message is for
some human to read.

        mkd


>Carl Gundel wrote:
>
>>Also, here's my front page.  Scamper doesn't like my JPEG graphic (the one
>>on top).  Any idea why?  http://www.libertybasic.com
>
>I tracked it down some distance.  When Scamper requests the image, your
>server responds with: 'HTTP/1.0 200 Document follows', which Scamper does
>not like at all: it sees the image as part of the header, and no image
>data where it expects it.  After retrying 3 times, it gives up and leaves
>things in a pretty messed up state (as far as threading goes ;-(
>
>Scamper seems to be expecting a standard "HTTP/1.0 200 OK" here.  I don't
>know HTML at all, so I'll leave it up to those more familiar with it to
>diagnose the problem in more detail.
>
>
>
>     -- tim