On Saturday 24 February 2001 10:08, Stephan Rudlof wrote:

> > "Recategorize all" first forgets all the categories that have been
> > assigned to methods in the current class, then does a "categorize from
> > superclasses".
>
> So it's possible that there a more *uncategorized* methods as before, in
> opposite to "categorize from superclasses".

Yes, that's right.

> But this contradicts a former statement by you:
> > > > * recategorize all
> > > > Recategorize all methods that are categorized in my superclasses;
> > > > leave the rest as uncategorized.
> > >
> > > Does this also mean moving already categorized methods in the actual
> > > class to uncategorized, if they aren't categorized in any superclass?
> >
> > No. Just as it says: "all methods that are categorized in my
> > superclasses".

I'm sorry, that was incorrect. Recategorize all can leave more methods 
uncategorized than you started with.

> , since my question here seems to be answered with 'Yes' here, isn't it?
>
> Thanks, I think I've gotten it now!

Play with it and see...

-- 
Ned Konz
currently: Stanwood, WA
email:     ned at bike-nomad.com
homepage:  http://bike-nomad.com