Ned,

>>     1/- Are the bitmaps for the toolbar buttons a bit out of
>> proportion ?

> With respect to what?

    wrt the flipping triangle.
    
    As you said, it depends on the screen resolution.

    For my system using 1280x1024, a smaller size 
    would look nicer. Again, this is strictly cosmetics.

> And I will be adding the categories to the SqueakMap support, so the 
> StarBrowser will fully replace:

> * PackagePanel (DVS tool)
> * CategoricalSMLoader
> * SMLoader
>
> etc...

    Glad to know that you are planning these.

    At less than 100 packages, SMLoader already looks crammed.

    I guess CategoricalSMLoader would greatly help.
    (Hey, how do I bring up this browser ;-)

    At the current growth rate, SqueakMap will host 
    thousands packages in no time ;-)

> Any more ideas or desires?

    What about an instance browser,  when you select a class, 
    it will show all instances of that class, then you drill down
    on each instance. Do we already have something like tis ?

    Ultimately, the truly Squeak(Class)Map browser, it shows
    class dependency. That would do wonders together with 
    DVS tools, RB and SpaghettiTracer.

    Please keep up with the good work.

    Cheers,

    PhiHo.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ned Konz" <ned at bike-nomad.com>
To: <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 2:02 AM
Subject: Re: [ANN] v3 of StarBrowser registered on SqueakMap: try it!


On Saturday 30 November 2002 10:40 pm, PhiHo Hoang wrote:
>     1/- Are the bitmaps for the toolbar buttons a bit out of
> proportion ?

With respect to what? I think they're rather dramatic that large 
<g>...

Actually, do you think they should be bigger or smaller? I just 
grabbed some KDE icons, and I had the choice of 16x16, 22x22, and 
32x32 (and bigger). These are the 22x22 ones, and they look fine on 
my system. But then I run my system at 1400x1050 pixels, which is 
about 98dpi on my monitor.

>     2/- There are 2 extra empty items under root, what are they.
>     (Please see attached gif).

I don't know. But I did find some places where the parent/child 
relationships were getting messed up.

I'll be releasing another version shortly, but keep playing with it.

I'm going to have to eliminate the mostly useless 
ClassificationItemWrapper to be able to support history.

I've added find, and will be adding a "recent expressions" list you 
can select intentional classification expressions from (which will 
come pre-loaded with some handy expressions).

I've also added change set browsing, XML file reading/displaying (but 
not editing), more support for SqueakMap and DVS, etc.

And I will be adding the categories to the SqueakMap support, so the 
StarBrowser will fully replace:

* PackagePanel (DVS tool)
* CategoricalSMLoader
* SMLoader

etc...

Any more ideas or desires?

-- 
Ned Konz
http://bike-nomad.com
GPG key ID: BEEA7EFE