Stephane Ducasse <ducasse at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
[Snip]
> The fact that we still have wonderland is really strange because I 
> remember having
> created a registry entry for vrml and other, so I certainly missed some 
> of them :)))))
That's the thing about feedback - I'm always thinking, but I did that,
didn't I? well, it's not there (or there was more, or I didn't save)...
:-)

> May be a useful stuff to do with spaghetti is to have the possibility 
> (I never look at it)
> to ask: what if ....
> 
> - what if FileList is in a pakage that contains ContentsBrowser
> 
> - what if FileList is in a package that has the package containing 
> ContentsBrowser
> as prereq.
If you recall what we talked in ESUG, I'm working out the implications
of a package model without any extra human declarations except
class-extensions. So prereqs are not supported in SpT. I'll tell you
that trying to somehow detect the functional dependencies Andreas was
talking about caused me to start thinking about declaring prerequisites
again (so I could say, Morph depends on SqueakCore, ignore those
connections, tell me what else there is).

But in the mean time I'm happy finding out what can be done using just
the source.
 
> I have the impression that this would be useful because what I see is 
> that from the list
> only view of the classes seems at the wrong place.
Not sure I understood this sentence...
 
> > Of which, at a glance, these I find hard to justify:
> > - SARInstaller
> > - ArchiveViewer
> > - ZipArchive
> > - CRDictionary
> > - CRDisplayProperties
> > - ChangeList
> > - ChangeSorter
> > - WonderlandEditor
> > - Wonderland
> > - FileContentsBrowser
> 
> Exactly because I have the impression they could register.
> FileList also -> self class.

Right.

Daniel