[BUG]Lots of unimplemented methods in 3.6#5373

Stephane Ducasse ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Thu Aug 14 17:24:29 UTC 2003


Hi ned

I do not know that this was a framework. Where is the doc :)?
I had just a guess of what it was suppose to do.

Ned could you explain how to use it. It may be wortht to put it in the 
comment of the class.
May be even separate it from SmalltalkImage

Stef


On Thursday, August 14, 2003, at 05:16 PM, Ned Konz wrote:

> On Wednesday 13 August 2003 11:59 pm, Stephane Ducasse wrote:
>
>> I was nearly finished to move all the none namespace related method
>> into a SmalltalkImage class, and I would like to understand. Are
>> you saying that all the mechanisms around MemoryHogs is just there
>> but never used?
>
> This is a framework. How can you say it's not used by a package?
>
> For instance, the BFAV *should* use this mechanism, as it can hang on
> to huge quantities of data (15Mb or so in my image).
>
> -- 
> Ned Konz
> http://bike-nomad.com
> GPG key ID: BEEA7EFE
>
>



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list