"Singletons" package on SM
Stéphane Rollandin
lecteur at zogotounga.net
Thu Dec 4 08:49:32 UTC 2003
> I've just placed a 15 minute hack on SM that might be useful to some
people. It allows for
> instance-specific behavior, or what's nicely termed "singleton methods"
in Ruby. I'm interested
> in comments.
I'm very interested in this idea (primarily in order to easily associate
arbitrary comments to individual morphs)
I tried this in a workspace:
| uh |
Smalltalk recreateSpecialObjectsArray.
uh _ Morph new.
uh becomeSingleton.
uh delegate: #extent to: World.
uh extent.
... and it worked fine (returned the World extent)
I also try those two:
| uh |
Smalltalk recreateSpecialObjectsArray.
uh _ #().
uh becomeSingleton.
uh delegate: #size to: #(1 2 3).
uh size.
and:
| uh |
Smalltalk recreateSpecialObjectsArray.
uh _ 'abcde'.
uh becomeSingleton.
uh to: #size run: [18].
uh size.
... both of them made Squeak (3.6-5424, 3.6.2 VM) hang badly (no answer to
Alt-.)
It would be nice to have an error sent when the singleton methods can not
be implemented. BTW, what are the rules allowing to know if a given class
will support that ?
regards,
Stef
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|