release prioritization (was "ClassBuilder problem")

Ned Konz ned at
Fri Feb 28 03:45:24 UTC 2003

On Thursday 27 February 2003 06:07 pm, Craig Latta wrote:
> > Since I'm doing that, I could also perhaps include Ned's recent
> > ArchiveViewer fix, since I've looked at that and its seems
> > straightforward and is a somewhat important fix.
>         (:
>         I don't think "somewhat important" cuts it at this release
> stage. Instead, I think it's better to weigh the results of leaving
> something
> out, rather than of including it.

If someone loads SqueakMap, they get SARInstaller. And then they get 
the fix.

So it's only people who *don't* get SqueakMap loaded into their images 
who are even going to see this problem.

I'd say:


Ned Konz

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list