Ok, to summarize:
1,2,3 have each integrated their passed first phase.
4 is undergoing some review by me, but will be more complex than I
though, and help would be welcome.
5 we don't know.
6 We'll wait for Michael's word about the latest version, and integrate.
7 Yoshiki is working on making it prettier. 
8 for menus seems a little controvertial. Suggestions welcome, otherwise
I propose we postpone it.
9 Is in Dougs pipeline.
10 is in Gorans.
11 is now agreed upon, I guess doug will implement.

Just a reminder - we're now about half way through the release cycle,
and enter beta in two weeks. If you want any of #(4 5 7 8) to get in,
hurry up and help, or shut up ;-)

Goes without saying that this is pretty much the last chance to remember
anything else you want to get into the release that isn't in this plan,
and it better be quick.

Daniel

goran.krampe at bluefish.se wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Been busy with work here...
> 
> Daniel Vainsencher <danielv at netvision.net.il> wrote:
> > Summary of plan as released + agreements that came afterwards -
> > 1 Removals
> > 2 KCP
> > 3 MCP
> > 4 Anthony runtime enhancements (split in two - fixes and closures)
> > 5 Craig's simulator fixes
> > 6 mir Network rewrite
> 
> I have gone through Michael's rewrite and it is very good. I sent him a
> few things about comments etc. IMHO it is - even without any more
> improvements - ready to go in.
> 
> I just sent a personal email to Michael asking about the latest and
> greatest though. I will get back to Doug with more on that.
> 
> > 7 TrueTypeTextStyle
> > 8 Diego look style enhancements
> > 9 Replace fonts with AccuFonts (mainly in order to remove the old -
> > people can now load additional nice fonts themselves anyway).
> > 10 SM 1.1
> 
> Brian Rice and I are working on SM1.1. We are moving and focused. :-)
> 
> In a week or something I can probably post a summary on that.
> 
> > 11 Inclusion of SM plus related packages in the release image (though
> > maintained as packages, not directly by update stream).
> 
> This is fine by me as described by Doug. And you don't need to wait for
> SM1.1 AFAICT.
> 
> regards, Göran