Chad Nantais <chad at whistler.com> wrote:
> I am building a system from the ground-up and would like to stick to 
> Squeak as much as possible to implement the system.  The system will 
> eventually generate hundreds of thousands of instances and I will need 
> quick, query-based access to these instances.  How far can I go with 
> using a Squeak image for storage before I need to use some form of 
> external storage like Relational or Object DBs?
> 

Safety is an issue.  Currently, if you run out of disk space in the
middle of an image save, your image is lost.

But I guess you'll have a good backup plan, plus plenty of disk space
anyway.....

-Lex