To me the primary names are going to be whatever designations we give to 
the kernel and the core/base.

If SM is going to be a primary means of distributing most all else above 
that via packages, then most everything above a VM and a image capable 
of allowing package distribution choices via SM will be up to the user.

Personally I don't necessarily plan on the 
kitchensink/carnival/wholeKitNKaboodle image for myself. I don't install 
my OSes that way I won't necessarily choose to do Squeak that way when 
there are choices. :)

When a package/distribution is merely (not an insult to SM, but rather a 
tremendous compliment) a list of packages, then expert/community 
designed configurations can abound. Possibly a swiki or experience 
rating system on SM could be done for bugs/conflicts etc. when 
downloading/installing a package/distribution.

I believe that this is something that will be greatly voted on by the 
community by its download and install patterns. Then we will truly know 
what the user/community thinks.

As I said, when Squeak is very OSlike and the user has OSlike install 
options I believe the user will make choices based on their purpose for 
that image or their personal usage patterns. Just like I always hate the 
default install of Windows. Yuck. Fortunately, I don't own any windows 
machines, unfortunately the ones I get to use are yucky default 
installs. :) ):

Jimmie Houchin