From: <goran.krampe at bluefish.se>
> Tim Rowledge <tim at sumeru.stanford.edu> wrote:
> > "Mark A. Schwenk" <mas at wellthot.com> wrote:
> >
> > > So I take it we don't have a process for an update stream of critical
> > > updates for the currently stable release as we did in days of yore?
> > We have exactly the same mechanisms available. Why wouldn't we?
>
> Right, we can do things like that. It's just work. :-) But I thought a
> *new release build* was requested. Anyway, this is silly - get the FIX
> posted first - then we will do what seems best.
>
> But please check that this isn't already fixed with the new Compiler
> etc.

Goran, I just read something about licensing issues with "the new Compiler
etc.". Does that mean it would likely still be useful to create a fix
against 3.6? I'd be happy to do that ASAP if it seems to make sense. I might
be able to do it tonight. I agree with you that there is a point at which it
becomes silly to talk about how to handle virtual fixes :-).

Cheers,

Peter van Rooijen
Amsterdam

> regards, Göran