It seems most projects have the wiki as a component of their website,
not the lot of it. For example, see handhelds.org. OTOH, squeak.org
should point at the wiki very clearly, and should not include any
fast-changing information. Download info, links to related sites
(squeakland, squeakfoundation, croquet...) and so forth should be on the
wiki where we can update them. So IMO, the static site should include
links to some of those pages.

I don't know how practical this is, but is would be nice if the swiki
pages were alternately addressable as swiki.squeak.org/squeak/1 or
something like that. More memorable than minnow...

my 0.02 nis
Daniel

Michael van der Gulik <mikevdg at hetnet.nl> wrote:
> It's really not that hard to update a web-site! It's just a case of 
> putting files in the right place on a server. Things like websites 
> shouldn't be wiki's because wiki's were never made for that; wiki's are 
> sort of half-way between a web site and a newsgroup. I would also not 
> imagine that a wiki could handle big loads.
> 
> mikevdg.
> 
> Simon Michael wrote:
> > Hi Marcus.. YAGNI. And when you do need it, you simply lock down the 
> > front page for a while.
> > 
> > I'd rather have a vibrant, live, cooperative site requiring a little 
> > ongoing cleanup than a perfectly safe, closed, stale one.