fixes to squeakmap/squeakpeople packages
ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Wed Dec 15 10:41:58 UTC 2004
normally squeaksource is done exactly for what you are looking for but
then people should use it.
Not your fault.
On 15 déc. 04, at 10:10, Ingo Hohmann wrote:
> Hi All,
> I just downloaded Testbrowser into a 3.9a-6523 image, and updated the
> calls to deprecated methods.
> Now, how do I proceed?
> Testbrowser is handled with monticello, so I could send an updated mcz
> to one of the maintainers, but emailing an mcz for 3 changed methods
> looks like overkill to me.
> I guess that I'm not the only/first one having done this, so I guess
> much of this effort gets lost, it would be nice to have a central
> point for managing thing like this, my ideas so far:
> - an "incoming" directory on squeaksource, where anyone can dump
> updated packages, which will then be somehow forwarded to the package
> - a central "fixes" mailing list, which essentially does the same.
> Now you could argue, that it is easy enough to do as it is, but
> history tells you that people are lazy as hell, so every additional
> step stops some people from doing it.
More information about the Squeak-dev