ned at squeakland.org
Mon Jan 26 17:39:11 UTC 2004
On Monday 26 January 2004 7:50 am, Ramiro Diaz Trepat wrote:
> Regarding the laying out of Morphs, I've seen that in the TableLayout it
> is not
> posile to "fix" a specific number of rows and columns. When you resize
> the main
> container window, components scroll up or down like if they were words
> on a word processor.
You can add more interior morphs to do this. For a forced 2 column display,
you can do this:
MyMorph (table, left-to-right, no wrap)
column1 (table, top-to-bottom, no wrap)
column2 (table, top-to-bottom, no wrap)
> Besides that, I also could not find a way to tell
> layout manager that a specific component might occupy, for instance 3
> cells horizontally and 1 vertically.
> I am sure that these things are resolved in some way in Squeak, if anybody
> could point me a *complex* window layout example to learn from it would be
Andreas made a very nice Active Essay about the layouts. It's on SqueakMap.
> Another question: why packages are not naturally nested on a tree
> structure in
> Squeak ? Wouldn't it be much more confortable than the current
> situation where
> all the people write category names with hiphens to denote inclusion.
There are two browser views, and a preference to add another column of
category hierarchy (browserShowsPackagePane or something like that).
> By the way, my experience so far coding in Squeak has been great, I
it will be my environment of choice until I retire ;)
More information about the Squeak-dev