Hi Vaidas,

	Thanks for your comments. You have said very interesting things
and I will take all of them into account for improving Jacaranda. I
didn't know that there were so much people using JacarandaShapes so now
I feel like obliged for improve them :) Thanks for the feedback.

Thanks

Regards, 
Hernán

> -----Original Message-----
> From: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org 
> [mailto:squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On 
> Behalf Of Vaidas Didzbalis
> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 7:26 AM
> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
> Subject: RE: [BUG][JACARANDA] Jacaranda does not like Connectors 2
> 
> 
> Thanks to Ned and  Hernán for these tools. Connectors very nice system
> aesthetically .
> Jacaranda adds support for interaction diagrams. This kind of 
> diagrams are
> most useful for me. It would be nice to specify uml class of 
> an object and
> create uml class selectors in scenario diagrams by drawing 
> message sends
> between objects as Rose does. It would be nice to make UML elements
> independent of their  appearance in diagrams -- Class or Use 
> Case may appear
> in many diagrams (maybe with different presentation options).
> Now I use Connectors + Jacaranda for sketching. Maybe UML 
> models could be
> stored on some shared object database on server?
> 
> Vaidas
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hernan Tylim [mailto:htylim at yahoo.com.ar]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 5:31 PM
> > To: squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> > Subject: Re: [BUG][JACARANDA] Jacaranda does not like Connectors 2
> >
> >
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> >     Thanks for your feedback.
> >
> >     Let me tell you that I am planning for this weekend to 
> make a new
> > release of Jacaranda. In that release I will take out the 
> DiagramBrowser
> > from Jacaranda and make for it its own package. With this 
> package you will
> > be able to use it with any version of Connectors, or 
> without Connectors at
> > all.
> >
> >     For the rest of Jacaranda, the shapes, similar but not equal,
> > to UML, I
> > am gonna make another package and make them use 
> Connectors2. But this I
> > think it could take me a little more time. But because I 
> didn't look at
> > Connectors2 yet I really don't know.
> >
> >     I am curious. Please tell me. Are anyone using the shapes
> > that come with
> > Jacaranda? They were developed for a OOP course here in 
> Argentina and
> > because of them I am maintaining them. I allways thought 
> that because they
> > were not like the ones in UML they would probably not be 
> used. (Note that
> > Connectors1 already came with a couple of UML Shapes, the ones I
> > am talking
> > are the ones in the Jacaranda flap)
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Regards,
> > Hernán
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Thomas A Petersen" <tpeterse at csc.com>
> > To: <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 11:29 AM
> > Subject: [BUG][JACARANDA] Jacaranda does not like Connectors 2
> >
> >
> > > Hernan,
> > >
> > > It looks like Jacaranda and Connectors 2 don't like each 
> other.  It
> > appears
> > > that the base classes have been mixed around a bit and 
> that the recent
> > > alterations in package loading may be ganging up on your current
> > > installation process.
> > >
> > > Jacaranda and Connectors make a great wired diagramming system.
> > >
> > > Thanks much,
> > >
> > > tap
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> 
>