Squeak people is written in?....
Giovanni Giorgi
giovanni.giorgi at siforge.org
Mon Jan 3 15:03:48 UTC 2005
I will suggest you to use xml only for import/export and compatibility
with the current implementation.
I have used succesfully SIXX for saving my data adn I like it a lot, but
for a quite medium application with more then 100 users I will strong
suggest to do not use XML as a storage medium.
XML is good for data manipulation but it is very very slow, and in my
past project I passed a lot of time tring to optimize the XML
transformer INSTEAD of testing or bug fixing.
Cees de Groot ha scritto in data 02/01/2005 22.12:
> On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 16:15:55 -0500, Yanni Chiu <yanni at rogers.com> wrote:
>
>> I've got a look/work-alike of SqueakPeople, done with Seaside 2.3.
>> It's not feature complete (i.e. logged-in vs. not logged-in behaviour,
>> and the ranking computation). The data is saved in PostgreSQL.
>>
> Seaside is the least of my trouble (note that I think we want SqP to
> publish static data "directly", e.g. with Kom or similar, so that we
> have clean static URL's just like SqP currently has). Biggest issue
> for a smooth transfer is the handling of SqP's XML data store,
> especially w.r.t. performance.
>
> What is the fastest XML parser for Squeak at the moment?
--
Giovanni Giorgi http://www.squeak.org
http://www.siforge.org
.............................................................
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|