HTTP server choices?
ken at kencausey.com
Tue Jan 3 22:10:56 UTC 2006
is another choice.
On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 13:54 -0800, Andreas Raab wrote:
> Hi Guys -
> Out of curiosity, what are the current options for running a web server
> in Squeak? Are all the current frameworks based on KOM or are there
> alternatives? If so, what are the tradeoffs? I'm basically looking for
> something that's small, simple to understand and extend and (hopefully)
> fast enough to be useful for more than a few dozen users.
> Thanks for any information you can provide!
> - Andreas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20060103/d6e8f728/attachment.pgp
More information about the Squeak-dev