About squeak image compatibility (3.6/7/8)
Blake
blake at kingdomrpg.com
Mon Jan 9 11:48:54 UTC 2006
On Mon, 09 Jan 2006 03:02:45 -0800, Cees De Groot <cdegroot at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 1/9/06, Blake <blake at kingdomrpg.com> wrote:
>> My immediate interest in this is that I was planning to use Alice to
>> teach
>> my kids about 3D graphics. I'd hate to see it go. At the same time, I'm
>> not sure I, personally, can salvage it.
>>
> You don't need to do it alone -
I would hope not. But my ability to contribute meaningfully at all would
have a lot to do with what was broken. And of course, I'm on a tight
schedule: I have to teach my kids before they grow up.<s>
I don't want to comment too much on the rest of what you say as I don't
really feel qualified. It seems to me that those things broken by internal
changes ought to be restricted to tools which actually need access to
those internals.
Formal specification-wise: Would it help? Or would it just ossify things
further?
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|