What to do with the PlusTools
Cees De Groot
cdegroot at gmail.com
Mon Jan 16 12:18:27 UTC 2006
On 1/16/06, Andreas Raab <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:
> > Brian Brown leads a ToolBuilder team, which hasn't been very active -
> > maybe it is an idea to rename it and change the focus?
> Bad idea. ToolBuilder is a framework, the tools are an application. You
> don't reassign framework people to any specific application (not as long
> as you want the framework be usable outside of that application).
I don't agree here - ToolBuilder is a framework for the tools, which
is not 'an application'. A Tools team would need to maintain the
browsers, debugger, workspace, ... - which in my eyes are a series of
applications, and modulo a couple of tools that are 'external' (MC,
MCC come to mind), it's the vast majority of the code base that uses
and probably will use the framework.
Ok, care is in order, because I know exactly what you mean here, seen
it too often :-). But I wouldn't reject the idea out of hand. Anyway,
I think it's ultimately for Brian and the team to decide, I was just
More information about the Squeak-dev