[FIX] Re: Compiler+Decompiler together have a serious 'bad
case' bug
stéphane ducasse
ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Wed Jul 26 09:53:04 UTC 2006
We hope to have somebody working full time two months on that
starting in october. But this is not completely sure.
Stef
On 25 juil. 06, at 15:48, Klaus D. Witzel wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 13:24:05 +0200, Marcus Denker wrote:
>> On 25.07.2006, at 11:29, Klaus D. Witzel wrote:
>> ...
>>> Does it make sense to check other builds / releases, is
>>> recompileAllTest up-to-date?
>>>
>>
>> No... we don't have an automated testserver, thus test are almost
>> never run. And tests
>> outside of SUnit are *never* run, of course....
>
> "automated testserver" is mentioned every now and then, is there
> something more tangible (whishlist, requirements)?
>
>> In 3.8, there is a Smalltalk>>#testDecompiler, which was made a
>> TestCase in 3.9a...
>> but it was kind of in a broken state, so I removed it to come back
>> later to it...
>>
>> FileOut attached.
>
> Thank you. When running "self debug: #testDecompiler" it raises
> ResumableTestFailure because of the variable order of the
> temporaries, especially of those [only those?] thrown in by macros
> (example: Object>>#copyFrom:). Unbelievable that there'd been a
> change in macro generation which is not in sync with Decompiler (or
> vice versa). So what's up with macros?
>
> /Klaus
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|