2006/11/21, J J <azreal1977 at hotmail.com>:
> >From: Lex Spoon <lex at cc.gatech.edu>
> >Reply-To: The general-purpose Squeak developers
> >list<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
> >To: squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> >Subject: Re: [ANN] stable package universe for 3.9
> >Date: 21 Nov 2006 11:26:36 +0100
> >
> >Things like this are certainly possible.  For example, it would be
> >great if SqueakSource had a button you could press to post a
> >package-universes release.
> >
> >I agree.  Ideas?  Unfortunately, my Squeak coding time is pretty
> >limited these days, but then again Smalltalk is dense enough that many
> >workable solutions just take a few lines of code....
> >
>
> If you publish something to squeak map do you have to go to the SqueakSource
> web page?  If that is the case then I think your idea above about the
> SqueakSource web site could be a really convenient way to do this.
>
> For each package, the site could show the universes that package is a part
> of.  If you publish a new version and you have universes defined then it
> could ask you if you want to publish to those universes.  This will probably
> take a bit of coding, but maybe it could get universes used more.
>
> Who would we have to talk to about adding something like this to
> squeaksource?

SqueakSource supports publishing to SqueakMap. But HTTPSocket does not
support POST via a proxy.

Philippe