Ron at USMedRec.com
Fri Oct 6 18:03:12 UTC 2006
Hi J J,
> From: J J
> Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 1:23 PM
> >From: "Ron Teitelbaum" <Ron at USMedRec.com>
> >I would like to have the DESPlugin which is already a part of the VMMaker
> >compiled internally in the distributed VM's, and we are considering
> >others to speed up implementations.
> What is the difference between the DESPlugin and the pure smalltalk DES
> that was provided.
DESPlugin is faster, but we haven't done any real tests to figure out how
much slower the native smalltalk version is. Des in general is a fast
algorithm. 3Des is 3 times slower. Form what I understand the native
version is acceptable for performance. Other things like SHA256 are fine
for hashing small values, but we found the difference between SHA1 and
SHA256 hashing 1 million a's is pretty significant. We expect SHA256 to be
slower but since I having written the plugin for it the difference is SHA1
is subsecond and SHA256 takes 38 seconds. This would be unacceptable
performance for and TLS1.2 ciphersuites. So a plugin is needed.
> Also it would be interesting to hear Bryce's input on this. Speeding up
> is good, but if the JIT turns out fast (as it sounds like it will) then we
> would want as much as possible to be pure smalltalk, no?
I would be interested in the answer.
More information about the Squeak-dev