sq 3.9 compiledmethod #sourceClass and #methodClass
denker at iam.unibe.ch
Wed Oct 11 09:42:42 UTC 2006
On 10.10.2006, at 18:11, tim Rowledge wrote:
>> so I guess it would be 1) first and later maybe 2, as the
>> CompiledMethod sharing makes
>> not much sense as soon as CompiledMethods know something about
>> where they are in the system.
> Yes, I think that having the method include the method class is
> essentially the same barrier to cm sharing (until 1) above) as
> having a super in the code. Is it practical to fix this very soon?
> Obviously the code to cope with a non-shared trait method is in
> place so could we just kill the shared case for now and re-wiggle
> the currently shared cases?
It should not be impossible to fix, but it would need to be done...
maybe adrian has an idea of how much work it would be?
More information about the Squeak-dev